I think we need to step back and really look at Bulldozer. April 12, H80 Cooler Runs ok at 6ghz passmark score beats all ivy bridge i5s and i7 k at 6ghz. However if you spend the money to buy an i5 then a good heat stink odviously that would be better. So, if they have improved Piledriver to a decent degree over Bulldozer, and have been able to decrease TDP per clock, then it could still end up being decent. AMD has frankly been stagnant in what it offers.
|Date Added:||18 November 2007|
|File Size:||54.38 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Intel Core i – 3. Success of any overclock is not guaranteed and the choice of motherboard will also directly affect the ability of the chip to reach higher speeds.
AMD FX-6200 3.8GHz Six Core (FD6200FRW6KGU) Processor
Intel Pentium G – 3. September 6, Now if AMD can look at their Bobcat architecture and see what it can do on the destkop side. June 2, So, my point was not to be mean to AMD, or unjustly punish them.
Seemingly a poor use of die space and transistor counts to achieve performance that is similar in pretty much all ways to the previous generation. I just wish you guys wouldn’t trash AMD when they come out with parts that are comparable to Intel at the same price point. Improvements came at last.
I’m not very sure the automatic design has anything to do with the lack of performance. The FX is not a terrible choice, fx620 if you want to learn how to overclock it is a lot of fun that way.
Ratings and Reviews Write a review.
My analysis and final determination of the product is based on the following factors. You know something tried and true, so to speak. Can’t wait for the next Podcast and here is to wishing that it gets a tad longer SSD’s firmware encryption is pretty floppy.
AMD FX-6200 3.8 GHz Six Core (FD6200FRGUBOX) Processor
I was just sorta going fx62000 that conversation another site had with an ex-AMDer who spoke up about the use of automation at AMD for processor design. The manufacturing issues we saw with Llano did not bode well for AMD or the upcoming Bulldozer products. It seems the long integer pipe and the high clocks aren’t the performance hindrance one may have thought P4 style.
April 6, Also, going back to die size, the FX and FX dwarf the smaller, cooler, and more efficient Intel products. These chips were fd6200 the same revision as the previous parts, and the speed increase they saw was due to the TDP ceiling being raised from 95 watts up to watts.
H80 Cooler Runs ok at 6ghz passmark score beats all ivy bridge i5s and i7 k at 6ghz. Still as you mentioned the chance is next to none since their production is fx2600 full swing with the Bulldozer and soon to be Piledriver. It’s a shame when a company acts like they do.
FX Can Run PC Game System Requirements
Bulldozer was released, well behind schedule, and with performance that barely rose above that of the previous Phenom II series of chips. That is so true Prestaeus, only because if you install and new computer AMD or Intel parts your are going to have a speedy machine.
This item doesn’t belong on this page. For Bulldozer to come out this way You know, even when overclocked the temps never really got above 50C. That is going to be very good for notebooks and ultra-thins. Not because I am somehow in love with the company, but rather I feel we need a decent company that can stand mostly toe to toe with Intel.
AMD FX CPU Review: A Small Bulldozer Refresh | PC Perspective
It probably is the scheduler and the FPU that probably are the main bottlenecks, though the high cache latency can’t help. Home Reviews News Forums.
Rooting for the underdog means you balance your expectations while understanding that they are an underdog and if they can get a decent part out then you congratulate them for keeping the big dog’s nose to the grindstone.